Thread:B214/@comment-30924344-20170605100644/@comment-30924344-20170606123351

Your logic "More in depth equals legitimate proof" over just a brief statement when it does not. So you'd say to me "This character is not gay because Ishibumi just said are gay' and not gave more details about it". Same fallacy as you saying someone doesn't like yougurt when they just told you they did, because they didn't give you the reason why. You say a character doing this is the actual proof over the author saying it himself not in story. Let's compare the length of the sentence of someone saying they like yogurt to ishibumi call GR an it and confirming its genderless. "I like yogurt" - "It doesn't fight". They are about the same length and are both brief confirmations of something.