User blog comment:B214/Question and Answers 6/@comment-3965848-20161128172019/@comment-1359322-20161129030147

And Ise's book means what? It's not absolute justice and if you ask me i don't view Ise as absolute justice, heck i don't even think Ise or anyone is correct at all. Besides, Ise himself peeks at girls changing etc which is clearly a crime too. As far as the general view of things are Ise is not much different from Hercules and Jeanne too. Neither of them are saints.

Okay jokes aside now on a serious note. To me, Ise is no different from the villains in this series. I'm not saying that guys like Rizevim is correct, Rizevim is by no means correct or righteous and there's no excuse for crime. I'm merely stating from the beliefs.

Different people holds different beliefs, different beliefs lead to different justice. All these people only acted in what they believe is right. We may consider what Ise did as correct due to the flow of the story, but is that really always the case? Ise only saved lives, he never ruined one at all? Sorry but i don't believe that.

Diehauser for example, Ise claims that Diehauser is wrong, but is that really for Ise to decide? Diehauser simply did what he believe was needed at that time and in a sense Diehauser didn't really do anything wrong either. He revealed the injustice in Rating Game which may help correct this problem in the future. If people really think that Diehauser is wrong simply because Ise said so, that's plain prejudice. In fact for me, Ise who said Diehauser is wrong is being childish and borderline arrogant. People care and prioritize different things which is why conflict occurs, you can't say the other is wrong simply because he acted on what he cares or believes at that time. That's like saying i'm the one who's correct and you're wrong. There's no absolute right or wrong and justice is merely difference in belief.